QCSP on Reflexive Tournaments
Benoit Larose, Petar Markovic, Barnaby Martin, Daniel, Paulusma, Siani Smith, Stanislav Zivny

TL;DR
This paper establishes a complexity classification for the QCSP on reflexive tournaments, showing it is either in NL or NP-hard depending on the structure of the tournament's strongly connected components.
Contribution
It provides a complete dichotomy for the complexity of QCSP on reflexive tournaments based on their strongly connected components.
Findings
QCSP(H) is in NL if both initial and final components are size 1.
QCSP(H) is NP-hard otherwise.
The complexity depends on the structure of the tournament's strongly connected components.
Abstract
We give a complexity dichotomy for the Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem QCSP(H) when H is a reflexive tournament. It is well-known that reflexive tournaments can be split into a sequence of strongly connected components H_1,...,H_n so that there exists an edge from every vertex of H_i to every vertex of H_j if and only if i<j. We prove that if H has both its initial and final strongly connected component (possibly equal) of size 1, then QCSP(H) is in NL and otherwise QCSP(H) is NP-hard.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
