Bridging between soft and hard thresholding by scaling

TL;DR

This paper introduces a scaled soft thresholding method that bridges soft and hard thresholding, analyzing its degrees of freedom and over-fitting sources, and providing insights into its risk behavior in sparse, large-sample settings.

Contribution

It develops a unified thresholding framework that includes soft, hard, and adaptive LASSO, with a detailed analysis of over-fitting and risk behavior.

Findings

Scaled soft thresholding bridges soft and hard thresholding methods.

Two sources of over-fitting are identified and analyzed.

Theoretical insights explain the risk behaviors of thresholding methods.

Abstract

In this article, we developed and analyzed a thresholding method in which soft thresholding estimators are independently expanded by empirical scaling values. The scaling values have a common hyper-parameter that is an order of expansion of an ideal scaling value that achieves hard thresholding. We simply call this estimator a scaled soft thresholding estimator. The scaled soft thresholding is a general method that includes the soft thresholding and non-negative garrote as special cases and gives an another derivation of adaptive LASSO. We then derived the degree of freedom of the scaled soft thresholding by means of the Stein's unbiased risk estimate and found that it is decomposed into the degree of freedom of soft thresholding and the reminder connecting to hard thresholding. In this meaning, the scaled soft thresholding gives a natural bridge between soft and hard thresholding methods. Since the degree of freedom represents the degree of over-fitting, this result implies that there are two sources of over-fitting in the scaled soft thresholding. The first source originated from soft thresholding is determined by the number of un-removed coefficients and is a natural measure of the degree of over-fitting. We analyzed the second source in a particular case of the scaled soft thresholding by referring a known result for hard thresholding. We then found that, in a sparse, large sample and non-parametric setting, the second source is largely determined by coefficient estimates whose true values are zeros and has an influence on over-fitting when threshold levels are around noise levels in those coefficient estimates. In a simple numerical example, these theoretical implications has well explained the behavior of the degree of freedom. Moreover, based on the results here and some known facts, we explained the behaviors of risks of soft, hard and scaled soft thresholding methods.