TL;DR
This paper introduces a set invariance approach to determine the sufficient number of scenarios for validating the safety of automated driving systems, providing probabilistic solutions and algorithms with theoretical guarantees.
Contribution
It formulates the scenario sampling safety assurance problem as a set invariance validation task and offers novel probabilistic algorithms with finite-sampling analysis for safety validation and quantification.
Findings
Proposes a set invariance perspective for safety validation.
Provides probabilistic complete and asymptotically optimal algorithms.
Demonstrates effectiveness through simulation experiments.
Abstract
How many scenarios are sufficient to validate the safe Operational Design Domain (ODD) of an Automated Driving System (ADS) equipped vehicle? Is a more significant number of sampled scenarios guaranteeing a more accurate safety assessment of the ADS? Despite the various empirical success of ADS safety evaluation with scenario sampling in practice, some of the fundamental properties are largely unknown. This paper seeks to remedy this gap by formulating and tackling the scenario sampling safety assurance problem from a set invariance perspective. First, a novel conceptual equivalence is drawn between the scenario sampling safety assurance problem and the data-driven robustly controlled forward invariant set validation and quantification problem. This paper then provides a series of resolution complete and probabilistic complete solutions with finite-sampling analyses for the safety…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
