TL;DR
This paper evaluates the applicability of continual learning techniques to sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR), providing a comprehensive benchmark analysis of their effectiveness, computational cost, and challenges like sensor noise and label scarcity.
Contribution
It introduces a general framework for benchmarking continual learning methods in HAR and offers an empirical analysis of their performance and limitations.
Findings
Continual learning techniques vary in effectiveness for HAR tasks.
Sensor noise and label scarcity significantly impact continual learning performance.
The study provides insights and future directions for HAR systems using continual learning.
Abstract
Sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR), i.e., the ability to discover human daily activity patterns from wearable or embedded sensors, is a key enabler for many real-world applications in smart homes, personal healthcare, and urban planning. However, with an increasing number of applications being deployed, an important question arises: how can a HAR system autonomously learn new activities over a long period of time without being re-engineered from scratch? This problem is known as continual learning and has been particularly popular in the domain of computer vision, where several techniques to attack it have been developed. This paper aims to assess to what extent such continual learning techniques can be applied to the HAR domain. To this end, we propose a general framework to evaluate the performance of such techniques on various types of commonly used HAR datasets. We then…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsDense Connections · Feedforward Network
