Assessment of deep learning based blood pressure prediction from PPG and rPPG signals
Fabian Schrumpf, Patrick Frenzel, Christoph Aust, Georg Osterhoff,, Mirco Fuchs

TL;DR
This study evaluates deep learning methods for non-invasive blood pressure prediction using PPG and rPPG signals, analyzing how data distribution affects accuracy and exploring transfer learning and personalization to improve results.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of BP prediction errors from PPG and rPPG signals, highlighting the impact of data distribution and demonstrating the effectiveness of transfer learning and personalization.
Findings
Prediction errors increase for less frequent BP values.
Transfer learning yields similar performance for rPPG and PPG-based predictions.
Personalization slightly reduces prediction errors.
Abstract
Exploiting photoplethysmography signals (PPG) for non-invasive blood pressure (BP) measurement is interesting for various reasons. First, PPG can easily be measured using fingerclip sensors. Second, camera-based approaches allow to derive remote PPG (rPPG) signals similar to PPG and therefore provide the opportunity for non-invasive measurements of BP. Various methods relying on machine learning techniques have recently been published. Performances are often reported as the mean average error (MAE) on the data which is problematic. This work aims to analyze the PPG- and rPPG-based BP prediction error with respect to the underlying data distribution. First, we train established neural network (NN) architectures and derive an appropriate parameterization of input segments drawn from continuous PPG signals. Second, we apply this parameterization to a larger PPG dataset and train NNs to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
