Cures, Treatments and Vaccines for Covid-19: International differences in interest on Twitter
Mike Thelwall

TL;DR
This study analyzes international Twitter reactions to Covid-19 cures, treatments, and vaccines, revealing trends, differences, and the impact of news and misinformation on public interest across countries.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of global Twitter interest in Covid-19 health measures, highlighting international differences and the influence of news and misinformation.
Findings
Lower HDI countries tweeted more about cures.
Vaccine interest increased sharply after key trial results.
Misinformation about alternative remedies gained traction.
Abstract
Since the Covid-19 pandemic is a global threat to health that few can fully escape, it has given a unique opportunity to study international reactions to a common problem. Such reactions can be partly obtained from public posts to Twitter, allowing investigations of changes in interest over time. This study analysed English-language Covid-19 tweets mentioning cures, treatments, or vaccines from 1 January 2020 to 8 April 2021, seeking trends and international differences. The results have methodological limitations but show a tendency for countries with a lower human development index score to tweet more about cures, although they were a minor topic for all countries. Vaccines were discussed about as much as treatments until July 2020, when they generated more interest because of developments in Russia. The November 2020 Pfizer-BioNTech preliminary Phase 3 trials results generated an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMisinformation and Its Impacts · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
