Study of the decay $D^+\to K^*(892)^+ K_S^0$ in $D^+\to K^+ K_S^0 \pi^0$
BESIII Collaboration: M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, S., Ahmed, M. Albrecht, R. Aliberti, A. Amoroso, M. R. An, Q. An, X. H. Bai, Y., Bai, O. Bakina, R. Baldini Ferroli, I. Balossino, Y. Ban, K. Begzsuren, N., Berger, M. Bertani, D. Bettoni, F. Bianchi, J. Bloms

TL;DR
This paper presents the first amplitude analysis of the decay $D^+ o K^+ K_S^0 \pi^0$, revealing the dominant $K^*(892)^+ K_S^0$ component and significantly improving the measurement precision of its branching fraction.
Contribution
It provides the first amplitude analysis of this decay mode and improves the precision of the branching fraction measurement.
Findings
$K^*(892)^+ K_S^0$ component is dominant with 57.1% fraction.
Branching fraction $ imes 10^{-3}$ is measured as 8.69 with improved precision.
Analysis enhances understanding of singly Cabibbo-suppressed $D^+$ decays.
Abstract
Based on an collision data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2.93 collected with the BESIII detector at , the first amplitude analysis of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decay is performed. From the amplitude analysis, the component is found to be dominant with a fraction of , where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. In combination with the absolute branching fraction measured by BESIII, we obtain , where the third uncertainty is due to the branching fraction . The precision of this result is significantly improved compared to the previous measurement.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
