A recipe for annotating grounded clarifications
Luciana Benotti, Patrick Blackburn

TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of grounded clarifications in dialogue for interpreting speaker intent, proposing a method for annotation and discussing associated challenges and ethical considerations.
Contribution
It introduces a novel recipe for annotating grounded clarifications, framing it as a crucial yet understudied aspect of natural language understanding.
Findings
Proposes a systematic approach for grounding annotations in dialogue
Highlights practical challenges in implementing clarification mechanisms
Discusses ethical issues related to grounding in dialogue systems
Abstract
In order to interpret the communicative intents of an utterance, it needs to be grounded in something that is outside of language; that is, grounded in world modalities. In this paper, we argue that dialogue clarification mechanisms make explicit the process of interpreting the communicative intents of the speaker's utterances by grounding them in the various modalities in which the dialogue is situated. This paper frames dialogue clarification mechanisms as an understudied research problem and a key missing piece in the giant jigsaw puzzle of natural language understanding. We discuss both the theoretical background and practical challenges posed by this problem and propose a recipe for obtaining grounding annotations. We conclude by highlighting ethical issues that need to be addressed in future work.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsJigsaw
