Can Hubbard model resist electric current?
Tao Li, Jianhua Yang

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the two-dimensional Hubbard model cannot sustain a steady electric current at finite temperature, contradicting recent claims, and clarifies its conductive behavior and limitations.
Contribution
It provides a perturbative proof that the Hubbard model cannot support a steady current under a uniform electric field at finite temperature, challenging previous simulation results.
Findings
Hubbard model is perfectly conducting in linear response
No steady state current can be supported at finite temperature
The model exhibits Bloch oscillations under finite electric field
Abstract
It is claimed by a recent quantum Monte Carlo simulation that the linear-in-temperature DC resistivity observed in the high- cuprate superconductors can be reproduced in the pure two dimensional Hubbard model\cite{Huang}. Here we show perturbatively that such a translational invariant electronic model can not support a steady state current in the presence of a uniform electric field at any finite temperature. Instead, the Hubbard model is perfectly conducting in the linear response regime and will undergo Bloch oscillation at finite electric field for any finite temperature. Nevertheless, the quantum Monte Carlo simulation can provide us the key information on the temperature dependence of the Drude weight, a quantity of central importance in the holographic description of the transport properties of the strange metal phase.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research
