Plasma response to resonant magnetic perturbations near rotation zero-crossing in low torque plasmas

TL;DR

This study investigates how the plasma response to resonant magnetic perturbations near the rotation zero-crossing affects ELM suppression in tokamaks, revealing the importance of the zero-crossing location and its effects.

Contribution

The paper demonstrates the dependence of plasma response on the rotation zero-crossing location using linear MHD modeling, highlighting the dual effects influencing response enhancement.

Findings

Plasma response is enhanced when zero-crossing occurs near rational surfaces.

Two effects influence response enhancement: rotation screening and resistive singular layer.

Response is tearing-like within the singular layer and kink-like outside it.

Abstract

Plasma response to resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) near the pedestal top is crucial for accessing edge localized modes (ELMs) suppression in tokamaks. Since radial location of rotation zero-crossing plays a key role in determining the threshold for field penetration of RMP, plasma response may be different in low input torque plasmas. In this work, the linear MHD code MARS-F is applied to reveal the dependence of plasma response to RMP on rotation zero-crossing by a scan of rotation profiles based on an EAST equilibrium. It is shown that the plasma response is enhanced when zero-crossing occurs near rational surfaces. The dependence of plasma response on the location of rotation zero-crossing is well fitted by a double Gaussian, indicating two effects in this enhancement. One is induced by rotation screening effect shown as a wide base (with a width around 10-20 krad/s), and the other is related to resistive singular layer effect characterized by a localized peak (with a width around 3-4 krad/s). The width of the peak scales with the resistive singular layer width. The plasma displacement suggests the response is tearing like when zero-crossing is within the singular layer, while it is kink like when zero-crossing is far from the layer. The enhancement of magnetic islands width at the peak is only around a factor of two, when the absolute value of local rotation is not larger than 10-20 krad/s. It is further confirmed in a modeling of plasma response in an EAST ELM suppression discharge. Though there is a zero-crossing in $E\times B$ rotation but not in electron perpendicular rotation, no significant difference in plasma response is obtained using these two rotation profiles. This suggests that the rotation near pedestal top should not be far away from zero but may not be necessary to have zero-crossing for accessing ELM suppression.