Improving Transparency in IDIQ Contracts: A Comparison of Common Procurement Issues Affecting Economies Across the Atlantic and Suggested Solutions
Sareesh Rawat

TL;DR
This paper compares procurement issues in IDIQ contracts across Europe and America, emphasizing transparency challenges and proposing solutions to improve accountability without sacrificing efficiency.
Contribution
It offers a cross-Atlantic analysis of IDIQ procurement challenges and suggests strategies to enhance transparency in public contracts.
Findings
IDIQ contracts are less transparent but widely used in both regions.
Balancing transparency and efficiency is crucial to prevent negative economic impacts.
Proposed solutions aim to improve accountability in public procurement.
Abstract
Expansions in the size and scope of public procurement across the Atlantic have increased calls for accountability of democratic governments. Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contracts by their very nature are less transparent but serve as major tools of public procurement in both the European and American economies. This paper utilizes a cross-Atlantic perspective to discuss common challenges faced by governments and contracting entities while highlighting the need for balancing transparency with efficiency to avoid negative economic outcomes. It concludes by discussing and providing potential solutions to certain common challenges.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPublic Procurement and Policy
Methods7 Fastest Ways to Call American Airlines Reservations Number (USA Guide)
