Binary Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae Identified With Kepler/K2
George H. Jacoby, Todd C. Hillwig, David Jones, Kayla Martin, Orsola, De Marco, Matthias Kronberger, Jonathan L. Hurowitz, Alison F. Crocker and, Josh Dey

TL;DR
This study uses Kepler/K2 data to identify 34 likely binary central stars of planetary nebulae, including seven eclipsing systems, revealing a binary fraction of about 21-24%, with many systems likely close binaries.
Contribution
First systematic search of Kepler/K2 data for binary central stars of planetary nebulae, discovering 29 new candidates and providing initial classifications and binary fraction estimates.
Findings
Identified 34 likely binary central stars, 7 with eclipses.
Estimated binary fraction among planetary nebulae central stars is approximately 21-24%.
Most identified binaries are likely close systems based on light curve analysis.
Abstract
We present the identification of 34 likely binary central stars (CSs) of planetary nebulae (PNe) from {\it Kepler/K2} data, seven of which show eclipses. Of these, 29 are new discoveries. Two additional CSs with more complicated variability are also presented. We examined the light curves of all `possible', `likely' and `true' PNe in every {\it Kepler/K2} campaign (0 through 19) to identify CS variability that may indicate a binary CS. For Campaigns 0, 2, 7, 15, and 16 we find 6 likely or confirmed variables among 21 PNe. Our primary effort, though, was focused on Campaign 11 which targeted a Galactic bulge field containing approximately 183 PNe, in which we identified 30 candidate variable CSs. The periods of these variables range from 2.3~h to 30~d, and based on our analysis, most are likely to be close binary star systems. We present periods and preliminary classifications…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
