When Non-Elitism Meets Time-Linkage Problems
Weijie Zheng, Qiaozhi Zhang, Huanhuan Chen, Xin Yao

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that non-elitist evolutionary algorithms outperform elitist ones on time-linkage problems by escaping local optima, with theoretical proofs and empirical validation showing improved runtime and success probability.
Contribution
It provides the first theoretical analysis showing non-elitism's advantage in time-linkage problems, including runtime bounds and empirical evidence.
Findings
Non-elitist (1,λ)EA can reach the global optimum with high probability.
Elitist (1+λ)EA tends to get stuck in local optima.
The compact genetic algorithm efficiently escapes local optima with expected runtime O(n^3 log n).
Abstract
Many real-world applications have the time-linkage property, and the only theoretical analysis is recently given by Zheng, et al. (TEVC 2021) on their proposed time-linkage OneMax problem, OneMax. However, only two elitist algorithms (1+1)EA and (+1)EA are analyzed, and it is unknown whether the non-elitism mechanism could help to escape the local optima existed in OneMax. In general, there are few theoretical results on the benefits of the non-elitism in evolutionary algorithms. In this work, we analyze on the influence of the non-elitism via comparing the performance of the elitist (1+)EA and its non-elitist counterpart (1,)EA. We prove that with probability (1+)EA will get stuck in the local optima and cannot find the global optimum, but with probability , (1,)EA can reach the global optimum and its expected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
