Mitigating the Effects of Reading Interruptions by Providing Reviews and Previews
Namrata Srivastava (1,2,3), Rajiv Jain (2), Jennifer Healey (2), Zoya, Bylinskii (2), Tilman Dingler (1) ((1) University of Melbourne (2) Adobe, (3) Monash University)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how summaries and previews can reduce the negative impact of interruptions on mobile reading, showing previews improve comprehension more effectively after interruptions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach of using targeted summaries and previews to mitigate reading disruptions, supported by pilot studies on mobile reading behaviors.
Findings
Previews after interruptions enhance comprehension more than reviews.
Users prefer reviews after interruptions for engagement.
Smart summaries can improve mobile reading experiences.
Abstract
As reading on mobile devices is becoming more ubiquitous, content is consumed in shorter intervals and is punctuated by frequent interruptions. In this work, we explore the best way to mitigate the effects of reading interruptions on longer text passages. Our hypothesis is that short summaries of either previously read content (reviews) or upcoming content (previews) will help the reader re-engage with the reading task. Our target use case is for students who study using electronic textbooks and who are frequently mobile. We present a series of pilot studies that examine the benefits of different types of summaries and their locations, with respect to variations in text content and participant cohorts. We find that users prefer reviews after an interruption, but that previews shown after interruptions have a larger positive influence on comprehension. Our work is a first step towards…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
