A Tale of Two Lexica Testing Computational Hypotheses with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Enes Avcu, Olivia Newman, David Gow

TL;DR
This study uses deep CNNs to model and compare the computational demands of dorsal and ventral language processing streams, revealing distinct strengths in semantic versus articulation tasks, supporting dual lexicon theories.
Contribution
It introduces a novel neural network approach to simulate and test the dual lexicon hypothesis in language processing.
Findings
Ventral CNN excelled in semantic classification tasks.
Dorsal CNN outperformed in articulation-related tasks.
Results support the existence of two specialized lexica in language processing.
Abstract
Gow's (2012) dual lexicon model suggests that the primary purpose of words is to mediate the mappings between acoustic-phonetic input and other forms of linguistic representation. Motivated by evidence from functional imaging, aphasia, and behavioral results, the model argues for the existence of two parallel wordform stores: the dorsal and ventral processing streams. In this paper, we tested the hypothesis that the complex, but systematic mapping between sound and articulation in the dorsal stream poses different computational pressures on feature sets than the more arbitrary mapping between sound and meaning. To test this hypothesis, we created two deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). While the dorsal network was trained to identify individual spoken words, the ventral network was trained to map them onto semantic classes. We then extracted patterns of network activation from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling · Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
