TL;DR
This paper introduces LioNets, a neural-specific local interpretation method for textual and time-series data, enhancing explainability in AI systems by providing feature importance and counterfactual explanations.
Contribution
It proposes a novel local interpretation technique tailored for neural models, with new feature importance presentation and counterfactual generation methods, along with an improved evaluation metric.
Findings
Effective feature importance explanations for neural models.
Generation of counterfactual words on textual data.
Enhanced evaluation metrics for interpretability quality.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has a tremendous impact on the unexpected growth of technology in almost every aspect. AI-powered systems are monitoring and deciding about sensitive economic and societal issues. The future is towards automation, and it must not be prevented. However, this is a conflicting viewpoint for a lot of people, due to the fear of uncontrollable AI systems. This concern could be reasonable if it was originating from considerations associated with social issues, like gender-biased, or obscure decision-making systems. Explainable AI (XAI) is recently treated as a huge step towards reliable systems, enhancing the trust of people to AI. Interpretable machine learning (IML), a subfield of XAI, is also an urgent topic of research. This paper presents a small but significant contribution to the IML community, focusing on a local-based, neural-specific interpretation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
