Transition fronts and their universality classes

TL;DR

This paper classifies three fundamental types of transition fronts in a prototypical nonlinear mechanical system, revealing their mathematical origins and unifying various previous classifications within a new analytical framework.

Contribution

It introduces a minimal quasicontinuum approximation that captures all three classes of transition fronts and clarifies their interrelations and origins.

Findings

Identified exactly three classes of switching fronts in the FPU chain.

Derived explicit Wiener-Hopf solutions for each class.

Unified previous classifications of mechanical transition fronts.

Abstract

Steadily moving transition (switching) fronts, bringing local transformation, symmetry breaking or collapse, are among the most important dynamic coherent structures. The nonlinear mechanical waves of this type play a major role in many modern applications involving the transmission of mechanical information in systems ranging from crystal lattices and metamaterials to macroscopic civil engineering structures. While many different classes of such dynamic fronts are known, the interrelation between them remains obscure. Here we consider a minimal prototypical mechanical system, the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam (FPU) chain with piecewise linear nonlinearity, and show that there are exactly three distinct classes of switching fronts, which differ fundamentally in how (and whether) they produce and transport oscillations. The fact that all three types of fronts could be obtained as explicit Wiener-Hopf solutions of the same discrete FPU problem, allows one to identify the exact mathematical origin of the particular features of each class. To make the underlying Hamiltonian dynamics analytically transparent, we construct a minimal quasicontinuum approximation of the FPU model that captures all three classes of the fronts and interrelation between them. This approximation is of higher order than conventional ones (KdV, Boussinesq) and involves mixed space-time derivatives. The proposed framework unifies previous attempts to classify the mechanical transition fronts as radiative, dispersive, topological or compressive and categorizes them instead as different types of dynamic lattice defects.