Robust Classification from Noisy Labels: Integrating Additional Knowledge for Chest Radiography Abnormality Assessment
Sebastian G\"undel, Arnaud A. A. Setio, Florin C. Ghesu, Sasa Grbic,, Bogdan Georgescu, Andreas Maier, Dorin Comaniciu

TL;DR
This paper presents robust training strategies for chest radiography abnormality classification that effectively handle noisy labels and incorporate medical knowledge, achieving state-of-the-art results on large datasets.
Contribution
It introduces novel methods to mitigate label noise by using prior probabilities, anatomical and comorbidity knowledge, and image normalization, enhancing classification accuracy.
Findings
Achieved an average AUC of 0.880 across 17 abnormalities.
Improved robustness to label noise in large-scale datasets.
State-of-the-art performance on extensive chest radiograph collections.
Abstract
Chest radiography is the most common radiographic examination performed in daily clinical practice for the detection of various heart and lung abnormalities. The large amount of data to be read and reported, with more than 100 studies per day for a single radiologist, poses a challenge in consistently maintaining high interpretation accuracy. The introduction of large-scale public datasets has led to a series of novel systems for automated abnormality classification. However, the labels of these datasets were obtained using natural language processed medical reports, yielding a large degree of label noise that can impact the performance. In this study, we propose novel training strategies that handle label noise from such suboptimal data. Prior label probabilities were measured on a subset of training data re-read by 4 board-certified radiologists and were used during training to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
