Detailed analysis of excited state systematics in a lattice QCD calculation of $g_A$
Jinchen He, David A. Brantley, Chia Cheng Chang, Ivan Chernyshev, Evan, Berkowitz, Dean Howarth, Christopher K\"orber, Aaron S. Meyer, Henry, Monge-Camacho, Enrico Rinaldi, Chris Bouchard, M.A. Clark, Arjun Singh, Gambhir, Christopher J. Monahan, Amy Nicholson, Pavlos Vranas

TL;DR
This study proposes a cost-effective multi-state analysis method at short to medium time separations in lattice QCD to better control excited state contamination in calculations of the nucleon axial charge, $g_A$, demonstrating improved accuracy over traditional long-time approaches.
Contribution
It introduces a global multi-state analysis strategy that enhances the control of excited state systematic uncertainties in lattice QCD calculations of $g_A$, especially at shorter time separations.
Findings
Excited state contamination reduces to 1% at ~1 fm for Feynman-Hellmann functions.
Standard three-point functions require >2 fm to suppress excited states below 1%.
Global analysis yields stable ground state parameters regardless of model variations.
Abstract
Excited state contamination remains one of the most challenging sources of systematic uncertainty to control in lattice QCD calculations of nucleon matrix elements and form factors: early time separations are contaminated by excited states and late times suffer from an exponentially bad signal-to-noise problem. High-statistics calculations at large time separations fm are commonly used to combat these issues. In this work, focusing on , we explore the alternative strategy of utilizing a large number of relatively low-statistics calculations at short to medium time separations (0.2--1 fm), combined with a multi-state analysis. On an ensemble with a pion mass of approximately 310 MeV and a lattice spacing of approximately 0.09 fm, we find this provides a more robust and economical method of quantifying and controlling the excited state systematic uncertainty. A…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
