Priority Lists for Power System Investments: Locating Phasor Measurement Units
Ilgiz Murzakhanov, David Pozo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a decision-making framework for incrementally upgrading power system components, using priority lists, which is more practical than classical re-optimization, especially for phasor measurement unit placement.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel priority list approach for power system upgrades, offering a practical alternative to classical re-optimization and demonstrating its effectiveness for PMU localization.
Findings
The framework aligns with power system upgrade evolution.
In certain cases, it matches classical re-optimization solutions.
It is practically applicable to large IEEE bus systems.
Abstract
Power systems incrementally and continuously upgrade their components, such as transmission lines, reactive capacitors, or generating units. Decision-making tools often support the selection of the best set of components to upgrade. Optimization models are often used to support decision making at a given point in time. After certain time intervals, re-optimization is performed to find new components to add. In this paper, we propose a decision-making framework for incrementally updating power system components. This is an alternative approach to the classical sequential re-optimization decision making for an investment problem with modeled budget constraints. Our approach provides a priority list as a solution with a list of new components to upgrade. We show that i) our framework is consistent with the evolution of power system upgrades, and ii) in particular circumstances, both…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
