Post-spontaneous-symmetry-breaking power-laws after a very strong earthquake: Indication for the preparation of a new strong earthquake or not?
Stelios M. Potirakis, Yiannis Contoyiannis, Konstantinos Eftaxias,, Nikolaos S. Melis, Constantinos Nomicos

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether post-earthquake power-law behaviors in electromagnetic emissions can indicate the potential for subsequent strong earthquakes, using a physics-inspired analysis method and comparing real data with a 3D Ising model.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to analyze post-earthquake electromagnetic emissions to assess the likelihood of future strong earthquakes, extending previous models to the post-SSB phase.
Findings
Post-SSB power-laws may signal preparation for new strong earthquakes.
The autocorrelation function plays a crucial role in the analysis.
Comparison with the 3D Ising model helps interpret the seismic electromagnetic signals.
Abstract
It has recently been found that the evolution of the preparation of a strong earthquake (EQ), as it is monitored through fracture-induced electromagnetic emissions (EME) in the MHz band, presents striking similarity with the evolution of a thermal system as temperature drops, since distinct steps of the evolution of the phenomenon of spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) can be identified. Here, the study of fracture-induced EME in the MHz band in analogy to thermal systems is extended to the phase of local fracture structures that follow after the SSB (and the occurrence of the main EQ). By comparing fracture-induced MHz EME associated with the strongest EQs (Mw=6.9) that occurred in Greece during the last twenty years with the 3D Ising model, a way to distinguish whether a possible identification of post-SSB power-laws immediately after a very strong EQ is a sign for the preparation of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
