Exact-corrected confidence interval for risk difference in noninferiority binomial trials
Nour Hawila, Arthur Berg

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new confidence interval estimator for risk difference in noninferiority binomial trials, offering improved accuracy and power, especially for small samples, supported by theoretical justification and simulations.
Contribution
It presents an exact-corrected confidence interval method that aligns with an unconditional test, enhancing existing approaches for noninferiority binomial trials.
Findings
Improved power for small sample sizes
Theoretically justified accuracy
Effective in simulations and real examples
Abstract
A novel confidence interval estimator is proposed for the risk difference in noninferiority binomial trials. The confidence interval is consistent with an exact unconditional test that preserves the type-I error, and has improved power, particularly for smaller sample sizes, compared to the confidence interval by Chan & Zhang (1999). The improved performance of the proposed confidence interval is theoretically justified and demonstrated with simulations and examples. An R package is also distributed that implements the proposed methods along with other confidence interval estimators.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
