Practical Resources for Enhancing the Reproducibility of Mechanistic Modeling in Systems Biology
Michael L. Blinov, John H. Gennari, Jonathan R. Karr, Ion I. Moraru,, David P. Nickerson, Herbert M. Sauro

TL;DR
This paper discusses practical resources and approaches from software engineering to improve the reproducibility of mechanistic modeling in systems biology, aiming to accelerate scientific progress.
Contribution
It identifies key standards, curation services, and software engineering techniques that can make systems biology research more reproducible and accessible.
Findings
Reproducibility of published results remains low at around 50%.
Resources like standards and curation services can improve reproducibility.
Adopting software engineering approaches can accelerate model development.
Abstract
Although reproducibility is a core tenet of the scientific method, it remains challenging to reproduce many results. Surprisingly, this also holds true for computational results in domains such as systems biology where there have been extensive standardization efforts. For example, Tiwari et al. recently found that they could only repeat 50% of published simulation results in systems biology. Toward improving the reproducibility of computational systems research, we identified several resources that investigators can leverage to make their research more accessible, executable, and comprehensible by others. In particular, we identified several domain standards and curation services, as well as powerful approaches pioneered by the software engineering industry that we believe many investigators could adopt. Together, we believe these approaches could substantially enhance the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
