Benchmarking preconditioned boundary integral formulations for acoustics
Elwin van 't Wout, Seyyed R. Haqshenas, Pierre G\'elat, Timo Betcke,, Nader Saffari

TL;DR
This paper benchmarks various preconditioned boundary integral formulations for acoustic wave simulations, providing insights into their computational efficiency and robustness across diverse geometries and configurations.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive survey and extensive benchmarking of boundary integral formulations and preconditioners for acoustics, aiding optimal method selection.
Findings
Preconditioned formulations significantly reduce computational time.
Certain formulations outperform others depending on geometry and frequency.
Extensive benchmarks reveal the strengths and limitations of various models.
Abstract
The boundary element method (BEM) is an efficient numerical method for simulating harmonic wave propagation. It uses boundary integral formulations of the Helmholtz equation at the interfaces of piecewise homogeneous domains. The discretisation of its weak formulation leads to a dense system of linear equations, which is typically solved with an iterative linear method such as GMRES. The application of BEM to simulating wave propagation through large-scale geometries is only feasible when compression and preconditioning techniques reduce the computational footprint. Furthermore, many different boundary integral equations exist that solve the same boundary value problem. The choice of preconditioner and boundary integral formulation is often optimised for a specific configuration, depending on the geometry, material characteristics, and driving frequency. On the one hand, the design…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
