A homogeneous spectroscopic analysis of a Kepler legacy sample of dwarfs for gravity-mode asteroseismology
Sarah Gebruers, Ilya Straumit, Andrew Tkachenko, Joey S. G. Mombarg,, May G. Pedersen, Timothy Van Reeth, Gang Li, Patricia Lampens, Ana Escorza,, Dominic M. Bowman, Peter De Cat, Lore Vermeylen, Julia Bodensteiner,, Hans-Walter Rix, Conny Aerts

TL;DR
This study combines high-resolution spectroscopy and asteroseismic data for 111 Kepler dwarf pulsators to improve stellar modeling and understand internal transport processes, revealing systematic metallicity overestimations and surface abundance patterns.
Contribution
It provides a homogeneous spectroscopic analysis of a Kepler dwarf star sample, integrating new machine learning techniques for parameter determination and highlighting systematic biases in literature metallicity estimates.
Findings
Systematic overestimation of [M/H] in literature for F-type dwarfs.
No correlation between CNO surface abundances and rotation in F-type stars.
Hints of deep mixing in B-type stars from C and O abundances.
Abstract
Asteroseismic modelling of the internal structure of main-sequence stars born with a convective core has so far been based on homogeneous analyses of space photometric Kepler light curves of 4 years duration, to which most often incomplete inhomogeneously deduced spectroscopic information was added to break degeneracies. We composed a sample of 111 dwarf gravity-mode pulsators observed by the Kepler space telescope whose light curves allowed for determination of their near-core rotation rates. For this sample we assembled HERMES high-resolution optical spectroscopy at the 1.2-m Mercator telescope. Our spectroscopic information offers additional observational input to also model the envelope layers of these non-radially pulsating dwarfs. We determined stellar parameters and surface abundances in a homogeneous way from atmospheric analysis with spectrum normalisation based on a new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
