Implementing Fair Regression In The Real World
Boris Ruf, Marcin Detyniecki

TL;DR
This paper examines how fair regression algorithms affect individual predictions and proposes post-processing methods to enhance their utility, addressing the gap between group fairness and individual impact.
Contribution
It investigates the individual-level effects of fair regression and introduces post-processing algorithms to improve their practical utility.
Findings
Fair regression alters individual predictions compared to baseline.
Post-processing algorithms can enhance the utility of fair regression.
The study provides insights into balancing fairness and individual accuracy.
Abstract
Most fair regression algorithms mitigate bias towards sensitive sub populations and therefore improve fairness at group level. In this paper, we investigate the impact of such implementation of fair regression on the individual. More precisely, we assess the evolution of continuous predictions from an unconstrained to a fair algorithm by comparing results from baseline algorithms with fair regression algorithms for the same data points. Based on our findings, we propose a set of post-processing algorithms to improve the utility of the existing fair regression approaches.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Income, Poverty, and Inequality
