Beyond the Dichotomy: How Ride-hailing Competes with and Complements Public Transport
Oded Cats, Rafa{\l} Kucharski, Santosh Rao Danda, Menno Yap

TL;DR
This study analyzes how ride-hailing services like Uber interact with public transport, revealing that they often complement each other rather than simply compete, with varying impacts on accessibility and demand based on travel times.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that ride-hailing both competes with and complements public transport, challenging the traditional dichotomy and highlighting nuanced interactions across different cities.
Findings
20-40% of ride-hailing trips lack viable public transport alternatives
Increased accessibility is greater in US cities than in Europe
Demand share correlates with relative travel time competitiveness
Abstract
Since ride-hailing has become an important travel alternative in many cities worldwide, a fervent debate is underway on whether it competes with or complements public transport services. We use Uber trip data in six cities in the United States and Europe to identify the most attractive public transport alternative for each ride. We then address the following questions: (i) How does ride-hailing travel time and cost compare to the fastest public transport alternative? (ii) What proportion of ride-hailing trips that do not have a viable public transport alternative? (iii) How does ride-hailing change overall service accessibility? (iv) What is the relation between demand share and relative competition between the two alternatives? Our findings suggest that the dichotomy - competing with or complementing - is false. Though the vast majority of ride-hailing trips have a viable public…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
