Comment on Field-dependent surface resistance for superconducting niobium accelerating cavities
Wolfgang Weingarten

TL;DR
This paper discusses the significance of small weak superconducting spots on niobium cavity surfaces and their impact on surface resistance, responding to prior criticism and emphasizing proximity and percolation effects.
Contribution
It highlights the role of small surface defects in superconducting niobium cavities, emphasizing their influence on surface resistance through proximity and percolation effects.
Findings
Small weak spots significantly affect surface resistance.
Proximity and percolation effects are crucial in understanding surface behavior.
Response clarifies previous criticisms about surface resistance mechanisms.
Abstract
First, this is a response to a criticism I have received about the paper which is mentioned in the title. Second, the aim is to show the important role of small (compared to coherence length) weak superconducting spots when located at the surface in connection with the proximity and percolation effects.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
