TL;DR
This paper conducts a comprehensive evaluation of deep learning architectures for mitochondria segmentation in electron microscopy images, emphasizing reproducibility, hyperparameter tuning, and benchmarking across multiple datasets.
Contribution
It provides an extensive, reproducible study of state-of-the-art models, identifying stable architectures and hyperparameters that achieve top performance on multiple datasets.
Findings
Achieved state-of-the-art results on EPFL Hippocampus dataset.
Outperformed previous methods on Lucchi++ and Kasthuri++ datasets.
Identified stable model configurations with consistent performance.
Abstract
Electron microscopy (EM) allows the identification of intracellular organelles such as mitochondria, providing insights for clinical and scientific studies. In recent years, a number of novel deep learning architectures have been published reporting superior performance, or even human-level accuracy, compared to previous approaches on public mitochondria segmentation datasets. Unfortunately, many of these publications do not make neither the code nor the full training details public to support the results obtained, leading to reproducibility issues and dubious model comparisons. For that reason, and following a recent code of best practices for reporting experimental results, we present an extensive study of the state-of-the-art deep learning architectures for the segmentation of mitochondria on EM volumes, and evaluate the impact in performance of different variations of 2D and 3D…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
