The EOS/Resolution Conspiracy: Convergence in Proto-Planetary Collision Simulations
Thomas Meier, Christian Reinhardt, Joachim Stadel

TL;DR
This study examines how the choice of equation of state and resolution in proto-planetary collision simulations significantly influences the outcomes, convergence, and physical accuracy of the results, especially regarding phase transitions and material behavior.
Contribution
It demonstrates that using thermodynamically consistent EOS like ANEOS improves convergence and physical realism in giant impact simulations compared to simpler EOS like Tillotson.
Findings
Tillotson EOS leads to excessive vapour production and non-converged results.
ANEOS EOS achieves convergence at lower resolutions for oblique impacts.
Proper resolution of phase transitions is crucial for accurate impact energy thresholds.
Abstract
We investigate how the choice of equation of state (EOS) and resolution conspire to affect the outcomes of giant impact (GI) simulations. We focus on the simple case of equal mass collisions of two Earth-like proto-planets showing that the choice of EOS has a profound impact on the outcome of such collisions as well as on the numerical convergence with resolution. In simulations where the Tillotson EOS is used, impacts generate an excess amount of vapour due to the lack of a thermodynamically consistent treatment of phase transitions and mixtures. In oblique collisions this enhances the artificial angular momentum (AM) transport from the planet to the circum-planetary disc reducing the planet's rotation period over time. Even at a resolution of particles the result is not converged. In head-on collisions the lack of a proper treatment of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
