Markov property of Lagrangian turbulence
A. Fuchs (1), M. Obligado (2), M. Bourgoin (3), M. Gibert (4), P.D., Mininni (5), J. Peinke (1) ((1) Institute of Physics, ForWind, University, of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany, (2) Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble, INP, LEGI, Grenoble, France

TL;DR
This paper provides the first evidence that Lagrangian turbulence exhibits Markov properties, enabling a stochastic thermodynamics approach to analyze particle trajectories and their entropy exchange in turbulent flows.
Contribution
It demonstrates the Markov property in Lagrangian turbulence for the first time and links it to Fokker-Planck equations and fluctuation theorems in non-equilibrium thermodynamics.
Findings
Markov property holds for finite step sizes dependent on the Stokes number.
Lagrangian particle statistics can be described by Fokker-Planck equations.
Entropy exchange along trajectories relates to intermittent flow structures.
Abstract
Based on direct numerical simulations with point-like inertial particles, with Stokes numbers, , , and , transported by homogeneous and isotropic turbulent flows, we present in this letter for the first time evidence for the existence of Markov property in Lagrangian turbulence. We show that the Markov property is valid for a finite step size larger than a Stokes number-dependent Einstein-Markov coherence time scale. This enables the description of multi-scale statistics of Lagrangian particles by Fokker-Planck equations, which can be embedded in an interdisciplinary approach linking the statistical description of turbulence with fluctuation theorems of non-equilibrium stochastic thermodynamics and local flow structures. The formalism allows estimation of the stochastic thermodynamics entropy exchange associated with the particles' Lagrangian trajectories.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
