On the Gibbs-Thomson equation for the crystallization of confined fluids
Laura Scalfi, Beno\^it Coasne, Benjamin Rotenberg

TL;DR
This paper revisits the derivation of the Gibbs-Thomson equation for confined fluid crystallization, clarifies its assumptions, and uses simulations to validate its predictions for melting temperatures in nanopores.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous derivation of the Gibbs-Thomson equation, clarifies the assumptions involved, and demonstrates its application through molecular simulations for confined fluids.
Findings
The Gibbs-Thomson equation can predict melting temperatures in large pores.
Simulations highlight challenges in sampling crystallization under confinement.
The approach offers a potential method to study nanoscale capillary freezing.
Abstract
The Gibbs-Thomson (GT) equation describes the shift of the crystallization temperature for a confined fluid with respect to the bulk as a function of pore size. While this century old relation is successfully used to analyze experiments, its derivations found in the literature often rely on nucleation theory arguments (i.e. kinetics instead of thermodynamics) or fail to state their assumptions, therefore leading to similar but different expressions. Here, we revisit the derivation of the GT equation to clarify the system definition, corresponding thermodynamic ensemble, and assumptions made along the way. We also discuss the role of the thermodynamic conditions in the external reservoir on the final result. We then turn to numerical simulations of a model system to compute independently the various terms entering in the GT equation, and compare the predictions of the latter with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
