[RE] CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot...for now
Joel Frank, Thorsten Holz

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the reproducibility of methods for detecting CNN-generated images, focusing on data augmentation and diversity to improve generalization across unseen architectures and identifying their limitations.
Contribution
It assesses the effectiveness of data augmentation and dataset diversity in enhancing classifier generalization for CNN-generated image detection.
Findings
Data augmentation and diverse datasets improve detection generalization.
Limitations exist in the current techniques' ability to handle all unseen CNN architectures.
Reproducibility of the original methods is confirmed.
Abstract
This work evaluates the reproducibility of the paper "CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now" by Wang et al. published at CVPR 2020. The paper addresses the challenge of detecting CNN-generated imagery, which has reached the potential to even fool humans. The authors propose two methods which help an image classifier to generalize from being trained on one specific CNN to detecting imagery produced by unseen architectures, training methods, or data sets. The paper proposes two methods to help a classifier generalize: (i) utilizing different kinds of data augmentations and (ii) using a diverse data set. This report focuses on assessing if these techniques indeed help the generalization process. Furthermore, we perform additional experiments to study the limitations of the proposed techniques.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Digital Media Forensic Detection · Advanced Image Processing Techniques
