TL;DR
This study develops an advanced finite element simulation scheme to analyze nonlinear buckling in composite thin-walled lenticular tubes, comparing their performance with TRAC booms and providing design insights.
Contribution
It introduces a parameterized design space for CTLTs and compares their bending performance with TRAC booms, highlighting optimal configurations.
Findings
Optimal CTLT designs outperform TRAC booms in bending performance.
Lumbus length and parabolic coefficient have opposite effects on stiffness anisotropy.
Nonlinear buckling behavior is crucial for reliable CTLT design.
Abstract
This paper presents an automatic finite element simulation scheme accounting for high geometric nonlinearity and the difference between linear and nonlinear buckling of composite thin-walled lenticular tubes (CTLTs). Parameterizing of cross-section shapes and generation of design space for CTLTs with both circular and parabolic arcs were accomplished, and several key factors were identified, in particular the contrary effect of lumbus length and parabolic coefficient on the bending stiffness anisotropy. The first quantitative comparison of triangular rollable and collapsible (TRAC) booms and CTLTs is given in terms of bending performance in two directions, showing that the optimal CTLT carefully selected from the design space demonstrates a comparable or even better performance than the TRAC boom. This is of great importance from both academic and engineering perspectives. Our efforts…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
