Lower Bounds Implementing Mediators in Asynchronous Systems
Ivan Geffner, Joseph Y. Halpern

TL;DR
This paper establishes tight bounds on the number of players needed to implement mediators in asynchronous systems, showing that below a certain threshold, such implementation is impossible, and relates this to secure computation limitations.
Contribution
It proves the tightness of the known bound for implementing mediators without a trusted third party in asynchronous systems and introduces a reduction from a weaker secure computation notion.
Findings
Bound n > 4(k+t) is necessary for implementation
Below this bound, certain robust equilibria cannot be implemented without a mediator
Provides an alternative proof for the lower bound in asynchronous secure computation
Abstract
Abraham, Dolev, Geffner, and Halpern proved that, in asynchronous systems, a -robust equilibrium for players and a trusted mediator can be implemented without the mediator as long as , where an equilibrium is -robust if, roughly speaking, no coalition of players can decrease the payoff of any of the other players, and no coalition of players can increase their payoff by deviating. We prove that this bound is tight, in the sense that if there exist -robust equilibria with a mediator that cannot be implemented by the players alone. Even though implementing -robust mediators seems closely related to implementing asynchronous multiparty -secure computation \cite{BCG93}, to the best of our knowledge there is no known straightforward reduction from one problem to another. Nevertheless, we show that there is a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptography and Data Security · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
