Why Must Primordial Non-Gaussianity Be Very Small?
Jason Kristiano, Jun'ichi Yokoyama

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that one-loop corrections in single-field inflation significantly constrain primordial non-Gaussianity, requiring it to be much smaller than current observational bounds to maintain the validity of perturbation theory.
Contribution
It calculates the one-loop correction to the power spectrum in single-field inflation, revealing the necessity for very small primordial non-Gaussianity.
Findings
One-loop corrections are larger than previously thought due to spectral tilt.
Primordial non-Gaussianity must be extremely small for perturbation theory validity.
Current observational bounds are not compatible with the theoretical constraints.
Abstract
One-loop correction to the power spectrum in generic single-field inflation is calculated by using standard perturbation theory. Because of the enhancement inversely proportional to the observed red tilt of the spectral index of curvature perturbation, the correction turns out to be much larger than previously anticipated. As a result, the primordial non-Gaussianity must be much smaller than the current observational bound in order to warrant the validity of cosmological perturbation theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
