TL;DR
This paper develops a formalism to predict and correct inference biases in gravitational-wave parameter estimation caused by overlapping signals and confusion noise, aiding analysis for future detectors like Einstein Telescope and LISA.
Contribution
It introduces generic metrics within the linear signal approximation to predict inference biases from overlapping GW signals and residuals, validated against simulations.
Findings
Reliable prediction of bias extent and direction
Formalism applicable to third-generation GW detectors
Potential for bias correction in multi-source analysis
Abstract
Understanding and dealing with inference biases in gravitational-wave (GW) parameter estimation when a plethora of signals are present in the data is one of the key challenges for the analysis of data from future GW detectors. Working within the linear signal approximation, we describe generic metrics to predict inference biases on GW source parameters in the presence of confusion noise from unfitted foregrounds, from overlapping signals that coalesce close in time to one another, and from residuals of other signals that have been incorrectly fitted out. We illustrate the formalism with simplified, yet realistic, scenarios appropriate to third-generation ground-based (Einstein Telescope) and space-based (LISA) detectors, and demonstrate its validity against Monte-Carlo simulations. We find it to be a reliable tool to cheaply predict the extent and direction of the biases. Finally, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
