Deprojecting Sersic Profiles for Arbitrary Triaxial Shapes: Robust Measures of Intrinsic and Projected Galaxy Sizes
Glenn van de Ven (1,3), Arjen van der Wel (2,3) ((1) University of, Vienna, (2) Ghent University, (3) MPIA Heidelberg)

TL;DR
This paper develops an analytical method to convert projected Sersic light profiles into three-dimensional distributions for triaxial galaxies, introducing a robust size measure, $r_{med}$, and practical proxies for observational data.
Contribution
It introduces a new, robust intrinsic galaxy size measure, $r_{med}$, and provides practical proxies for projected sizes, accounting for triaxial shapes and inclinations.
Findings
$r_{med}$ is nearly independent of Sersic index and axis ratios.
Projected semi-major axis length of 50% light ellipse is an unbiased proxy for $r_{med}$ with ~10% scatter.
For populations with unknown triaxiality, $1.3 imes R_e$ estimates $r_{med}$ with 20-30% scatter.
Abstract
We present the analytical framework for converting projected light distributions with a S\'ersic profile into three-dimensional light distributions for stellar systems of arbitrary triaxial shape. The main practical result is the definition of a simple yet robust measure of intrinsic galaxy size: the median radius , defined as the radius of a sphere that contains 50% of the total luminosity or mass, that is, the median distance of a star to the galaxy center. We examine how depends on projected size measurements as a function of S\'ersic index and intrinsic axis ratios, and demonstrate its relative independence of these parameters. As an application we show that the projected semi-major axis length of the ellipse enclosing 50% of the light is an unbiased proxy for , with small galaxy-to-galaxy scatter of 10% (1), under the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
