Mitigating baryonic effects with a theoretical error covariance

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new mitigation technique for baryonic effects in cosmic shear analysis, using an extended covariance matrix informed by hydrodynamical simulations to reduce parameter bias.

Contribution

The authors develop a novel method that incorporates baryonic uncertainties into the covariance matrix, improving bias mitigation in cosmic shear cosmology analyses.

Findings

Reduces bias in cosmological parameters like Ω_m and σ_8.

Maintains robustness across different baryonic models.

Offers a modest decrease in precision to achieve bias reduction.

Abstract

One of the primary sources of uncertainties in modeling the cosmic-shear power spectrum on small scales is the effect of baryonic physics. Accurate cosmology for Stage-IV surveys requires knowledge of the matter power spectrum deep in the nonlinear regime at the percent level. Therefore, it is important to develop reliable mitigation techniques to take into account baryonic uncertainties if information from small scales is to be considered in the cosmological analysis. In this work, we develop a new mitigation method for dealing with baryonic physics for the case of the shear angular power spectrum. The method is based on an extended covariance matrix that incorporates baryonic uncertainties informed by hydrodynamical simulations. We use the results from 13 hydrodynamical simulations and the residual errors arising from a fit to a $\Lambda$CDM model using the extended halo model code {\tt HMCode} to account for baryonic physics. These residual errors are used to model a so-called theoretical error covariance matrix that is added to the original covariance matrix. In order to assess the performance of the method, we use the 2D tomographic shear from four hydrodynamical simulations that have different extremes of baryonic parameters as mock data and run a likelihood analysis comparing the residual bias on $\Omega_m$ and $\sigma_8$ of our method and the HMCode for an LSST-like survey. We use different modelling of the theoretical error covariance matrix to test the robustness of the method. We show that it is possible to reduce the bias in the determination of the tested cosmological parameters at the price of a modest decrease in the precision.