TL;DR
This paper introduces Boolean function metrics to help biological modelers evaluate and select logical rules, ensuring their biological plausibility and improving model accuracy in complex signaling networks.
Contribution
It links semantic Boolean function characterization with biological plausibility, proposing metrics to analyze rule impact and guide logical operator choices in biological models.
Findings
Boolean function bias correlates with regulatory outcomes
Metrics identify biologically implausible rules
Rule specification influences network dynamics
Abstract
Computational models of biological processes provide one of the most powerful methods for a detailed analysis of the mechanisms that drive the behavior of complex systems. Logic-based modeling has enhanced our understanding and interpretation of those systems. Defining rules that determine how the output activity of biological entities is regulated by their respective inputs has proven to be challenging, due to increasingly larger models and the presence of noise in data, allowing multiple model parameterizations to fit the experimental observations. We present several Boolean function metrics that provide modelers with the appropriate framework to analyze the impact of a particular model parameterization. We demonstrate the link between a semantic characterization of a Boolean function and its consistency with the model's underlying regulatory structure. We further define the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
