Simulating near-field enhancement in transmission of airborne viruses with a quadrature-based model

TL;DR

This study introduces QuaRAD, an efficient quadrature-based model that simulates near-field virus particle transmission, revealing significant variability in infection risk and the limitations of standard physical distancing guidelines.

Contribution

We developed QuaRAD, a computationally efficient model to quantify near-field airborne virus transmission and associated uncertainties, enabling large-scale scenario analysis.

Findings

Over 50% of scenarios require distancing beyond 2 meters without masks.

Near-field enhancement significantly increases infection risk near the infectious individual.

Transmission risk varies greatly across different simulated scenarios.

Abstract

Airborne viruses, such as influenza, tuberculosis, and SARS-CoV-2, are transmitted through virus-laden particles expelled when an infectious person sneezes, coughs, talks, or breathes. These virus-laden particles are more highly concentrated in the expiratory jet of an infectious person than in a well-mixed room, but this near-field enhancement in virion exposure has not been well quantified. Transmission of airborne viruses depends on factors that are inherently variable and, in many cases, poorly constrained, and quantifying this uncertainty requires large ensembles of model simulations that span the variability in input parameters. However, models that are well-suited to simulate the near-field evolution of respiratory particles are also computationally expensive, which limits the exploration of parametric uncertainty. In order to perform many simulations that span the wide variability in factors governing transmission, we developed the Quadrature-based model of Respiratory Aerosol and Droplets (QuaRAD). QuaRAD is an efficient framework for simulating the evolution of virus-laden particles after they are expelled from an infectious person, their deposition to the nasal cavity of a susceptible person, and the subsequent risk of initial infection. We simulated 10,000 scenarios to quantify the risk of initial infection by a particular virus, SARS-CoV-2. The predicted risk of infection was highly variable among scenarios and, in each scenario, was strongly enhanced near the infectious individual. In more than 50% of scenarios, the physical distancing needed to avoid near-field enhancements in airborne transmission was beyond the recommended safe distance of two meters (six feet) if the infectious person is not wearing a mask, though this distance defining the near-field extent was also highly variable among scenarios.