On the Perception of Plagiarism in Academia: Context and Intent
Aaron Gregory, Joshua Leeman

TL;DR
This paper explores how perceptions of plagiarism vary across different cultural and institutional contexts, emphasizing the importance of understanding intent and environment in academic integrity issues.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of the historical, legal, and cultural perspectives on plagiarism, highlighting differences in definitions and sanctions worldwide.
Findings
Perceptions of plagiarism differ significantly across countries and cultures.
Legal consequences of plagiarism vary, with some countries imposing criminal penalties.
Understanding context and intent is crucial in assessing plagiarism cases.
Abstract
Plagiarism is the representation of another author's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work. In educational contexts, there are differing definitions of plagiarism depending on the institution. Prominent scholars of plagiarism include Rebecca Moore Howard, Susan Blum, Tracey Bretag, and Sarah Elaine Eaton, among others. Plagiarism is considered a violation of academic integrity and a breach of journalistic ethics. It is subject to sanctions such as penalties, suspension, expulsion from school or work, substantial fines and even incarceration. Recently, cases of "extreme plagiarism" have been identified in academia. The modern concept of plagiarism as immoral and originality as an ideal emerged in Europe in the 18th century, particularly with the Romantic movement. Generally, plagiarism is not in itself a crime, but like counterfeiting fraud can be punished…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAcademic integrity and plagiarism · Legal Education and Practice Innovations
