EXOPLINES: Molecular Absorption Cross-Section Database for Brown Dwarf and Giant Exoplanet Atmospheres
Ehsan Gharib-Nezhad, Aishwarya R. Iyer, Michael R. Line, Richard S., Freedman, Mark S. Marley, and Natasha E. Batalha

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive database of molecular absorption cross-sections for key atmospheric molecules relevant to brown dwarfs and exoplanets, highlighting the impact of line list choices on spectral modeling accuracy.
Contribution
The authors present a new database of pre-computed molecular absorption cross-sections covering a wide range of molecules, pressures, and temperatures, and analyze how different line lists affect atmospheric spectra.
Findings
Significant spectral and thermal profile variations due to line list differences.
Up to 320 ppm variation in transmission spectra of Ultra-Hot Jupiters.
Differences up to 125% in spectra of M-dwarfs, mainly from TiO line-lists.
Abstract
Stellar, substellar, and planetary atmosphere models are all highly sensitive to the input opacities. Generational differences between various state-of-the-art stellar/planetary models are primarily because of incomplete and outdated atomic/molecular line-lists. Here we present a database of pre-computed absorption cross-sections for all isotopologues of key atmospheric molecules relevant to late-type stellar, brown dwarf, and planetary atmospheres: MgH, AlH, CaH, TiH, CrH, FeH, SiO, TiO, VO, and H2O. The pressure and temperature ranges of the computed opacities are between 10--3000~bar and 75--4000~K, and their spectral ranges are 0.25--330~m for many cases where possible. For cases with no pressure-broadening data, we use collision theory to bridge the gap. We also probe the effect of absorption cross-sections calculated from different line lists in the context of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
