Comparison of pulsed electroacoustic and thermally stimulated depolarization current measurements of thermally poled PET electrets

TL;DR

This study compares pulsed electroacoustic and thermally stimulated depolarization current methods for analyzing PET electrets, revealing how electrode configurations and charge mechanisms influence measurements and demonstrating their complementary use in electret analysis.

Contribution

It introduces improved PEA deconvolution procedures and correlates PEA and TSDC measurements to better understand polarization mechanisms in PET electrets.

Findings

Charge profiles are similar across electrode types but depolarization currents differ.

Electrode blocking behavior affects charge injection and depolarization.

PEA and TSDC together provide comprehensive insights into electret polarization.

Abstract

We have compared measurements of a set of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) electret samples by means of pulsed electroacoustic method (PEA) and thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) techniques. Experimental parameters such as the combined thermal and electrical history and the electrode type have been selected in order to correlate the polarization mechanisms revealed by TSDC with the charge profile measured by PEA in five different cases. Existing deconvolution procedures for PEA have been improved as a means to enhance the calibration of PEA signals in the case of thin samples. Samples where the $\alpha$ dipolar relaxation or the $\rho$ space charge relaxation is activated show a uniform polarization that manifests itself as image charge at the electrodes. In the experiments where external charge carriers are injected into the sample, the same poling procedure has been tested under different electrode configurations. Charge profiles are qualitatively similar in all of them but the depolarization currents show clearly different behavior. These differences are explained, on the one hand, by the different blocking behavior of vacuum-deposited aluminum electrodes with regards to electrodes with a thin air gap and, on the other hand, by the distinct behavior of electrodes with an air gap for both directions of the charge carriers. Numerical analysis of the polarization of TSDC peaks and charge per unit area of charge profiles supports this interpretation and confirms the relationship between both measurement techniques. All in all, PEA in combination with TSDC turns out to be a useful technique in the study of thermally poled electrets, either in the study of relaxations or of external charge.