A muon-track reconstruction exploiting stochastic losses for large-scale Cherenkov detectors
R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M., Ahrens, C. Alispach, A. A. Alves Jr., N. M. Amin, R. An, K. Andeen, T., Anderson, I. Ansseau, G. Anton, C. Arg\"uelles, S. Axani, X. Bai, A., Balagopal V., A. Barbano, S. W. Barwick, B. Bastian, V. Basu, S. Baur

TL;DR
This paper introduces a stochastic loss-based muon-track reconstruction method for IceCube, significantly improving angular resolution by modeling the muon energy loss as stochastic showers rather than continuous loss.
Contribution
It presents a novel parametrization of muon energy loss using stochastic showers, enhancing the accuracy of muon track reconstruction in Cherenkov detectors.
Findings
Up to 20% improvement in angular resolution for through-going tracks
Up to 2 times better resolution for starting tracks
Enhanced robustness in uncertainty estimation
Abstract
IceCube is a cubic-kilometer Cherenkov telescope operating at the South Pole. The main goal of IceCube is the detection of astrophysical neutrinos and the identification of their sources. High-energy muon neutrinos are observed via the secondary muons produced in charge current interactions with nuclei in the ice. Currently, the best performing muon track directional reconstruction is based on a maximum likelihood method using the arrival time distribution of Cherenkov photons registered by the experiment's photomultipliers. A known systematic shortcoming of the prevailing method is to assume a continuous energy loss along the muon track. However at energies TeV the light yield from muons is dominated by stochastic showers. This paper discusses a generalized ansatz where the expected arrival time distribution is parametrized by a stochastic muon energy loss pattern. This more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
