Stellar Metallicities from SkyMapper Photometry II: Precise photometric metallicities of $\sim$280,000 giant stars with [Fe/H] $< -0.75$ in the Milky Way
Anirudh Chiti, Anna Frebel, Mohammad K. Mardini, Tatsuya W. Daniel,, Xiaowei Ou, Anastasiia V. Uvarova

TL;DR
This paper presents a method to derive precise photometric metallicities for approximately 280,000 giant stars in the Milky Way using SkyMapper data, validated against spectroscopic surveys, to study early chemical evolution.
Contribution
The study introduces a new photometric metallicity calibration for large samples of Milky Way stars, extending the metallicity range down to [Fe/H] < -2.5 with validated accuracy.
Findings
Photometric metallicities agree well with spectroscopic surveys (σ~0.25 dex).
Low-metallicity ([Fe/H] < -2.5) stars show no significant offset with high-resolution data.
Expanded catalog includes metallicities for ~720,000 stars for Galactic studies.
Abstract
The Milky Way's metal-poor stars are nearby ancient objects that are used to study early chemical evolution and the assembly and structure of the Milky Way. Here we present reliable metallicities of stars with [Fe/H] down to derived using metallicity-sensitive photometry from the second data release (DR2) of the SkyMapper Southern Survey. We use the dependency of the flux through the SkyMapper filter on the strength of the Ca II K absorption features, in tandem with SkyMapper photometry, to derive photometric metallicities for these stars. We find that metallicities derived in this way compare well to metallicities derived in large-scale spectroscopic surveys, and use such comparisons to calibrate and quantify systematics as a function of location, reddening, and color. We find good agreement with metallicities from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
