Paths, cycles and sprinkling in random hypergraphs
Oliver Cooley

TL;DR
This paper establishes a lower bound on the length of the longest j-tight cycle in random hypergraphs, introducing a novel extension argument to connect paths into cycles beyond standard methods.
Contribution
It provides a new lower bound for cycle length in hypergraphs and develops an extension technique to connect paths into cycles, surpassing traditional sprinkling approaches.
Findings
Proves existence of long j-tight paths in random hypergraphs
Introduces an extension method to close paths into cycles
Establishes a lower bound on cycle length in hypergraphs
Abstract
We prove a lower bound on the length of the longest -tight cycle in a -uniform binomial random hypergraph for any . We first prove the existence of a -tight path of the required length. The standard "sprinkling" argument is not enough to show that this path can be closed to a -tight cycle -- we therefore show that the path has many extensions, which is sufficient to allow the sprinkling to close the cycle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
