Bilimits are Bifinal Objects
Andrea Gagna, Yonatan Harpaz, Edoardo Lanari

TL;DR
This paper characterizes (lax) bilimits in 2-categories using limiting contractions and shows they are equivalent to limiting bifinal objects within the framework of marked 2-categories, enhancing understanding of lax limits.
Contribution
It introduces a new characterization of (lax) bilimits via limiting contractions and establishes their equivalence to bifinal objects in the category of cones.
Findings
Bilimits are characterized by limiting contractions.
Lax bilimits are equivalent to limiting bifinal objects.
Framework applies to various laxity levels, including pseudo-limits.
Abstract
We prove that a (lax) bilimit of a 2-functor is characterized by the existence of a limiting contraction in the 2-category of (lax) cones over the diagram. We also investigate the notion of bifinal object and prove that a (lax) bilimit is a limiting bifinal object in the category of cones. Everything is developed in the context of marked 2-categories, so that the machinery can be applied to different levels of laxity, including pseudo-limits.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
