Short Cyclic Structures in Polymer Model Networks: A Test of Mean Field Approximation by Monte Carlo Simulations
Michael Lang, Konrad Schwenke, Jens-Uwe Sommer

TL;DR
This study compares mean field rate theory predictions with Monte Carlo simulations for polymer network formation, highlighting the conditions under which mean-field models are accurate or less appropriate, especially considering cyclic structures and copolymerization effects.
Contribution
It introduces a mean field model that accounts for short cyclic structures in polymer networks and tests its validity against Monte Carlo simulations for homo- and co-polymerization.
Findings
Mean field models accurately predict homo-polymerization at high concentrations.
Simulation data fit well with a single geometric parameter for cyclization.
Co-polymerization shows significant deviations from mean-field predictions due to local intermixing.
Abstract
A mean field rate theory description of the homo- and co-polymerization of -functional molecules is developed, which contains the formation of short cyclic structures inside the network. The predictions of this model are compared with Monte-Carlo simulations of cross-linking of star polymers in solution. We find that homo-polymerizations are well captured by mean-field models at concentrations larger than one quarter of the geometrical overlap concentration. All simulation data can be fit using a single geometric parameter for cyclization. The simulation data reveal that within the range of parameters of the present study correlations among multiply connected molecules can be neglected. Thus, mean-field treatments of homopolymerizations are reasonable approximations, if short cycles are properly addressed. Co-polymerization is considered in the case of strict A-B reactions, where all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
