A proposal for relative in-flight flux self-calibrations for spectro-photometric surveys
S. Davini (1), I. Risso (1, 2), M. Scodeggio (3), L. Paganin (1 and, 2), S. Caprioli (1), M. Bonici (1, 2), A. Caminata (1), S. Di Domizio (1, and 2), G. Testera (1), S. Tosi (1, 2), B. Valerio (1, 2), M. Fumana, (3), P. Franzetti (3) ((1) INFN Sezione di Genova

TL;DR
This paper introduces a versatile in-flight self-calibration method for spectro-photometers in galaxy surveys, enabling accurate relative response function inference using $$ statistics and simulations.
Contribution
The proposed method is general, unbiased, and effective for in-flight calibration of spectro-photometric instruments in satellite galaxy surveys.
Findings
The method accurately reconstructs the instrument response in simulations.
The number of sources and exposures significantly impact calibration accuracy.
Validation shows promising performance in realistic survey scenarios.
Abstract
We present a method for the in-flight relative flux self-calibration of a spectro-photometer instrument, general enough to be applied to any upcoming galaxy survey on satellite. The instrument response function, that accounts for a smooth continuous variation due to telescope optics, on top of a discontinuous effect due to the segmentation of the detector, is inferred with a statistics. The method provides unbiased inference of the sources count rates and of the reconstructed relative response function, in the limit of high count rates. We simulate a simplified sequence of observations following a spatial random pattern and realistic distributions of sources and count rates, with the purpose of quantifying the relative importance of the number of sources and exposures for correctly reconstructing the instrument response. We present a validation of the method, with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
